AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of JOSEPH MARRA et al., Respondents, v. CHARLES J. HYNES, as District Attorney of Kings County, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the cross motion is granted, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

The instant proceeding, which was commenced in January 1994, seeks to compel the District Attorney of Kings County to return certain items of personal property to the petitioners. The record indicates that these items (1) were seized from the residence of the petitioners Joseph and Diana Marra during the execution of a search warrant which was based on probable cause and issued by the Supreme Court, Kings County, in January 1993, and (2) are being held in connection with an ongoing criminal investigation of the petitioner Joseph Marra. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court erred in granting the petition (see, Simpson v St. John, 93 N.Y. 363; Matter of DeBellis v Property Clerk of City of N Y, 79 N.Y.2d 49; Matter of Documents Seized Pursuant to Search Warrant, 124 Misc.2d 897; Kamienska v County of Westchester, 39 Misc.2d 750; cf., People v Gutterson, 34 N.Y.S.2d 174; People v Harris, 178 Misc. 371). O'Brien, J.P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MARRA v. HYNES
(Nov 20, 1995)