Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. DOUGLAS F. NELSON, APPELLANT.

Drunk Driving: Prior Convictions. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Reissue 1993) is a mere affirmance and continuation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07, and convictions under § 39-669.07 can be used to enhance the penalty for driving while under the influence of alcohol under § 60-6,196.

White, C.J.

This case involves an appeal from a conviction of driving while under the influence of alcohol (DWI), third offense, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Reissue 1993). The defendant, Douglas F. Nelson, contends that his two prior convictions, imposed under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Cum. Supp. 1986 Supp. 1987), cannot be used to enhance his DWI sentence under § 60-6,196. On appeal to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, the court held that § 60-6,196 is a mere affirmance of § 39-669.07 and that the prior convictions can be used for enhancement purposes under § 60-6,196. State v. Nelson, 95 NCA No. 17, case No. A-94-794 (not designated for permanent publication). Nelson successfully petitioned this court for further review.

Our recent decision in State v. Sundling, ante p. 732, 538 N.W.2d 749 (1995), is controlling. Sundling held that § 60-6,196 is a mere affirmance and continuation of § 39-669.07 and that convictions under § 39-669.07 can be used to enhance the penalty for a DWI conviction under § 60-6,196. Therefore, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. NELSON
(Nov 17, 1995)