AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROY WILLIAMS, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

A defendant's right to be present at trial may be forfeited where he deliberately absents himself from the trial (see, People v Sanchez, 65 N.Y.2d 436). The defendant failed to appear for jury deliberations, during which portions of the transcript were read to the jury. "Before proceeding in the defendant's absence, the court should have made inquiry and recited on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant's absence was deliberate" (People v Brooks, 75 N.Y.2d 898, 899). The court's failure to conduct an inquiry into the defendant's absence on the record coupled with the court's reading back of portions of the transcript in the defendant's absence necessitate reversal ( see, People v Carroll, 196 A.D.2d 546).

We find no merit to the defendant's remaining contentions. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and Florio, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS
(Nov 27, 1995)