Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The court properly denied the defendants' motion for leave to amend their answer to assert three counterclaims against the plaintiff-father for contribution and/or indemnification. The defendants' proposed amended answer failed to allege "the type of affirmative conduct needed by a parent to remove this case from the general rule that mere negligent supervision of a child is not actionable" (Navaro v Ieraci, 214 A.D.2d 713, 714). Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.