AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MARCIA RAFKIND et al., Respondents, v. LAWRENCE E. CLARK et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is undisputed that the plaintiffs were stopped in traffic on the Cross Bronx Expressway when their car was hit from the rear by a van driven by the defendant Lawrence E. Clark and owned by the defendant Thomas Young Trucking. This Court has previously held that such a rear-end collision creates a prima facie case of liability on the part of the defendant, imposing a duty of explanation on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle (Young v City of New York, 113 A.D.2d 833, 834; see, Benyarko v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 162 A.D.2d 572, 573; O'Callaghan v Flitter, 112 A.D.2d 1030). The defendants' conclusory speculations in opposition to the plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment were insufficient to rebut the inference of negligence and to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to liability (see, Young v City of New York, supra; Benyarko v Avis Rent A Car Sys., supra). Thus, the plaintiffs were entitled to summary judgment (see, Andre v Pomeroy, 35 N.Y.2d 361; O'Callaghan v Flitter, supra). Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAFKIND v. CLARK
(Nov 27, 1995)