Ordered that the appeal from the order dated April 12, 1994, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Robinson v Laurent, 205 A.D.2d 517); and it is further,
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs.
In order to vacate a default judgment, a defendant must demonstrate that there was an excusable delay and a meritorious defense (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Kyriacopoulos v Mendon Leasing Corp., 216 A.D.2d 532; Matter of Hostomsky v Electronic Data Sys. Corp., 214 A.D.2d 733; Korea Exch. Bank v Attilio, 186 A.D.2d 634). The defendants failed to sustain their burden of demonstrating a meritorious defense. Accordingly, the default judgment entered against them will not be vacated (see, Palostrada v Modugno, 168 A.D.2d 673). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.