Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM D. MEENAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JEAN RICH-MEENAN AND GEORGE BATCHELOR, PETITIONERS, v. ROBERT H. NEWMAN, AS CIRCUIT JUDGE OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, LINDA HARRINGTON, DAVID RICH, STEPHEN JOHN MEENAN AND MICHAEL RICH-MEENAN, RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The order of reference to a special master without consent of opposing parties was explicitly contrary to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c). For this reason, prohibition is granted so as to prevent respondents from further enforcing the order of reference. Moreover, we grant mandamus to compel the respondent to hear and determine the matters encompassed in the order of reference. Rosen v. Solomon, 586 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We assume issuance of a formal writ will not be necessary.

Relief awarded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEENAN v. NEWMAN
(Dec 13, 1995)