Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KEVIN MURPH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for Kevin Murph filed this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the convictions and sentences but remand the case for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement.

At the sentencing hearing the court stated that it sentenced Murph to three and one-half years in prison for robbery with a firearm in Case No. 92-3041CF. The trial court entered a written sentence of seventy-one months in prison on that charge. This court must remand the case for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement. See Williams v. State, 591 So.2d 329 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We, therefore, remand with directions to the trial court to enter a written sentence which complies with its oral pronouncement.

FRANK, A.C.J., and PARKER and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MURPH v. STATE
(Dec 20, 1995)