AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of MARK LA BOUNTY, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing Units, et al., Respondents.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was involved in an incident in which he made racist accusations regarding the grievance procedure and the grievance coordinator in the presence of a group of inmates and encouraged them to chant "we're with you". As a result, he was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting an inmate from urging other inmates to engage in actions detrimental to the order of the facility. Petitioner contends that this determination is not supported by substantial evidence and was made in retaliation for his having filed a grievance. We are unpersuaded. The misbehavior report, combined with the testimony of the grievance coordinator, provides substantial evidence supporting the determination. Petitioner has failed to advance proof to substantiate his claim that the determination was made in retaliation for his filing of a grievance.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LA BOUNTY v. SELSKY
(Dec 21, 1995)