AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDDIE SANCHEZ, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

It was not improper for the police to put the defendant in a lineup even though they were aware that he was represented by counsel on an unrelated matter. Formal criminal proceedings against the defendant had not yet commenced and the defendant did not request the assistance of counsel at the lineup (see, People v Hernandez, 70 N.Y.2d 833; People v McKenzie, 180 A.D.2d 827; People v Bryant, 178 A.D.2d 420; cf., People v Coates, 74 N.Y.2d 244; People v LoPizzo, 173 A.D.2d 562).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, were waived as a part of the negotiated plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1). Rosenblatt, J.P., Copertino, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SANCHEZ
(Dec 29, 1995)