Defendant's constitutional speedy trial claim was properly denied since "the allegations in his motion papers did not spell out a legal basis for relief" ( People v Lomax, 50 N.Y.2d 351, 358; see, People v Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442). Furthermore, appellate "review is precluded by lack of an adequate record that includes, among other things, the minutes of any adjournments" ( People v Brisko, 219 A.D.2d 493, 494). It is thus impossible to ascertain the reasons for delay ( People v Taranovich, supra, at 445).
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Rubin, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.