Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RAINEY v. THE STATE

THOMPSON, Justice.

Rainey was convicted of rape and possession of cocaine following a jury trial at which direct evidence of guilt was offered during the State's case-in-chief. He did not request a jury instruction on the law of circumstantial evidence, and none was given by the trial court. His convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals in Rainey v. State, 216 Ga. App. 557 ( 455 S.E.2d 73) (1995). We granted certiorari because the issues presented in Rainey's petition were then pending before this Court in Stubbs v. State, 265 Ga. 883 ( 463 S.E.2d 686) (1995). We subsequently rendered our decision in Stubbs, in which we reiterated that where the State's case rests both on direct and circumstantial evidence, a jury instruction on circumstantial evidence is required to be given only upon request. Since Rainey failed to request a charge on the law of circumstantial evidence as set out in OCGA § 24-4-6, the judgment of the Court of Appeals must be affirmed. Stubbs, supra.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Fletcher, P. J., who concurs in the judgment only.

THOMPSON, Justice.

DECIDED JANUARY 22, 1996.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAINEY v. STATE
(Jan 22, 1996)