Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The defendant seeks an order vacating his prior judgment of conviction and granting him a new trial based on the People's alleged failure to provide him with a certain police report which contains what purports to be the exculpatory statement of a key prosecution witness (see generally, Brady v Maryland, 373 U.S. 83; People v Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286; see also, People v Jackson, 78 N.Y.2d 638). We have no basis upon which to disturb the finding of the Supreme Court, made after a hearing, that the police report in question is a counterfeit.
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Sullivan and Hart, JJ., concur.