Supreme Court properly denied the petition since habeas corpus relief is not available to remedy either a purported violation of petitioner's speedy trial rights under CPL 30.30 (1) (a) ( see, People ex rel. Chakwin v Warden, 63 N.Y.2d 120, 124-125; Matter of Kassebaum v al-Rahman, 212 A.D.2d 482), or alleged deficiencies in the Grand Jury proceedings relating to laboratory analysis reports admitted into evidence and petitioner's knowledge of the weight of the drugs ( see, People ex rel. Manning v Warden, 178 A.D.2d 169, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 759).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Ross and Williams, JJ.