AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KEVIN QUINN et al., Appellants, v. K-MART CORPORATION, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: This action arises out of injuries allegedly sustained by Kevin Quinn (plaintiff) when he slipped and fell in defendant's department store. Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs submitted proof in evidentiary form that the plastic bag on which plaintiff slipped had been on the floor for at least 30 minutes, thereby raising an issue of fact whether defendant is chargeable with constructive notice of a dangerous condition (see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837-838; cf., Milea v. Ames Dept. Store, 219 A.D.2d 798). Additionally, the conclusion of plaintiffs' expert that the arrangement of the men's department was dangerous raises an issue of fact whether defendant created a dangerous condition (see, Thornhill v. Toys "R" Us NYTEX, 183 A.D.2d 1071; cf., Kaufman v. Man-Dell Food Stores, 203 A.D.2d 532).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

QUINN v. K-MART CORPORATION
(Feb 2, 1996)