Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN; PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Eugene E. CLAY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Submitted Jan. 18, 1996.
Decided Feb. 1, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-5-NN, CA-95-79-4)
Eugene E. Clay, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Cathy Ellen Krinick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Clay, Nos. CR-92-5-NN; CA-95-79-4 (E.D.Va. Aug. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.