Ordered that the amended sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the court was not divested of jurisdiction in this matter as a result of the delay in imposing restitution (see, People v. Drake, 61 N.Y.2d 359). The defendant entered his plea of guilty with the understanding that he would be ordered to pay restitution in addition to serving a prison sentence. Moreover, the People proffered a reasonable explanation for the delay (see, People v Drake, supra).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.