AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of TONY HARRISON, Petitioner, v. JOANNE FERDINAND, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, e.g. Matter of Dunnigan v. Weissman, 181 A.D.2d 731). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HARRISON v. FERDINAND
(Feb 5, 1996)