Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Denzil NORMAN v. STATE of Arkansas

1. CONTEMPT — COUNSEL DIRECTED TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT. — Appellant's attorney was directed to appear before the supreme court and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court for failure to file appellant's brief in accordance with the court's Per Curiam Order of April 24, 1995.

PER CURIAM.

George Stone, attorney for appellant, is directed to appear before this court on February 26, 1996, at 9 a.m. and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court for failure to file the appellant's brief in accordance with this court's Per Curiam Order of April 24, 1995.

Order Issued.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NORMAN v. STATE
(Feb 12, 1996)