AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

RAYMOND C. DURKIN et al., Appellants, v. DURKIN FUEL ACQUISITION CORP. et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) ROBINSON OIL CORP., Respondent,

Ordered that the order in Action No. 1 is affirmed; and it is further;

Ordered that the order in Action No. 2 is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that Durkin Fuel Acquisition Corp. and Robinson Oil Corp. are awarded one bill of costs.

The terms of the restrictive covenant in this case are reasonable under the circumstances ( see, Karpinski v. Ingrasci, 28 N.Y.2d 45; Town Line Repairs v. Anderson, 90 A.D.2d 517), and justify a preliminary injunction in Action No. 2.

With respect to the appeal from the order in Action No. 1, we note only that permanent injunctions and declaratory judgments are not provisional remedies and may not be obtained in a motion prior to the joinder of issue ( see, CPLR 103, 3001, 3211, 3212, 6301 et seq.). Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DURKIN v. DURKIN FUEL ACQUISITION CORP
(Feb 20, 1996)