MILOS v. EXXON CO., USA, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Richard V. Jones argued the cause for appellant ( Bressler, Amery Ross, attorneys). Jerry M. Finn argued the cause for respondent ( Schneider, Goldberger, Cohen, Finn, Solomon, Leder Montalbano, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Richard V. Jones argued the cause for appellant ( Bressler, Amery Ross, attorneys). Jerry M. Finn argued the cause for respondent ( Schneider, Goldberger, Cohen, Finn, Solomon, Leder Montalbano, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

WALTER MILOS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EXXON COMPANY, USA,RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Rodriguez of the Appellate Division, reported at 281 N.J. Super. 194, 656 A.2d 1300 (1995).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, STEIN and COLEMAN — 6.

Opposed — none.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MILOS v. EXXON CO., USA

WALTER MILOS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EXXON COMPANY, USA,RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Comments