AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of WILLIAM DEGROAT, Respondent, v. JAMES F. KRALIK, Appellant.

Ordered that on the Court's own motion the appellant's notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petitioner's motion is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The petitioner purportedly commenced this proceeding against James F. Kralik, the Sheriff of Rockland County, a natural person, by merely serving the notice of petition and petition upon a deputy sheriff. No subsequent mailing of the papers took place. Since James F. Kralik never designated the deputy sheriff as an agent to accept service in accordance with CPLR 318, service was ineffective pursuant to CPLR 308 (3) (see, Matter of Shea v. Kralik, 220 A.D.2d 750; Matter of Gottesman, 127 A.D.2d 563; Espy v. Giorlando, 85 A.D.2d 652). We discern no other valid method of service (cf., CPLR 308; 311). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DeGROAT v. KRALIK
(Feb 26, 1996)