Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Following a vehicle chase through the City of Rochester, defendant exited his vehicle and, while attempting to flee on foot, was apprehended by a Rochester police officer. Another officer, who had pursued defendant during the vehicle chase but who had momentarily lost sight of defendant before defendant's apprehension, then identified defendant to the apprehending officer as the driver of the vehicle. County Court properly determined that the identification was confirmatory and that no CPL 710.30 notice was required ( see, People v Starr, 221 A.D.2d 488; People v Dueno, 203 A.D.2d 476, 477; People v Jackson, 167 A.D.2d 420, 420-421, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 962).