AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LINDA JACOBS, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because defendant did not object to the prosecutor's summation, her argument that the prosecutor's characterization of the witnesses was improper is not preserved for our review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v Pierce, 219 A.D.2d 856). In any event, the prosecutor's isolated comment did not deprive defendant of a fair trial ( see, People v Dunbar, 213 A.D.2d 1000, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 972).

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. We have reviewed the contention raised in defendant's pro se supplemental brief and conclude that it is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JACOBS
(Mar 8, 1996)