PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's revocation of probation. However, the trial court failed to reduce its finding of revocation to writing. See West v. State, 553 So.2d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), disapproved on other grounds sub nom., State v. Norstrom, 613 So.2d 437 (Fla. 1993); see also Maxlow v. State, 636 So.2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). We therefore remand for entry of a written order of revocation specifying the conditions appellant violated.
AFFIRMED, but REMANDED.
DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.