Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

RUSSELL M. WARE, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. ADRIAN P. SCHOONE, RICHARD A. FORTUNE AND MARK J. LEUCK, Defendants-Respondents-Respondents, SCHOONE, FORTUNE LEUCK, S.C., Defendant.

(Affirming 191 Wis.2d 359 (table), 530 N.W.2d 69 (Ct.App. 1995).)

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the unpublished decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed, Chief Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice JON P. WILCOX, and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and Justice JANINE P. GESKE being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WARE v. SCHOONE
(Mar 29, 1996)