WADE v. DUKE UNIVERSITY

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

I.C. No. 044357

Attorney(S)

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Pro se. Defendant: Nathaniel Whitfield, Attorney, Durham, North Carolina
Counsel of
Maupin Taylor Ellis Adams, Attorneys, Raleigh, N.C. Timothy S. Riordan, Counsel of
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Judges

ORDER FOR THE FULL COMMISSION BY THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

I.C. No. 044357

Attorney(S)

APPEARANCES Plaintiff: Pro se. Defendant: Nathaniel Whitfield, Attorney, Durham, North Carolina
Counsel of
Maupin Taylor Ellis Adams, Attorneys, Raleigh, N.C. Timothy S. Riordan, Counsel of
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Judges

ORDER FOR THE FULL COMMISSION BY THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

LAVERNE WADE, Employee, Plaintiff; v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, Employer; SELF-INSURED (R. E. PRATT COMPANY, SERVICING AGENT,) Defendant.

ORDER FOR THE FULL COMMISSION BY THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

While this matter is on appeal to the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the Full Commission is without authority to Order any party to comply with any portion of an Opinion and Award from which the appeal is taken.

Therefore, after careful consideration, Plaintiff's 29 March 1996 Motion to Compel is DENIED.

S/ _________________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

LAVERNE WADE, Employee, Plaintiff; v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, Employer; SELF-INSURED (R. E. PRATT COMPANY, SERVICING AGENT,) Defendant.

Comments