AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of MARC A. GRECO, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Given the fact that petitioner was prevented from taking the 1988 Sergeant's examination by, what was subsequently determined to be, respondents' wrongful termination of his employment ( see, Matter of Department of Personnel v. New York Civ. Serv. Commn., 180 A.D.2d 449, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 755), his passing grade on the next-scheduled Sergeant's examination in 1993 should have been accepted as a makeup for the earlier examination.

However, notwithstanding such wrongful discharge, the IAS Court properly upheld respondents' determination that petitioner was not entitled, based on his subsequent passing of the next-scheduled Sergeant's examination in 1993, to retroactive promotion to Sergeant with full retroactive benefits for that title. The appropriate remedy for defects in the Civil Service appointment or promotion process is not retroactive appointment or promotion with an award of back pay, which would violate the strong State policy of discretionary governmental appointive power underlying Civil Service Law § 61, but rather reconsideration for appointment or promotion after the defect in the process has been corrected ( Matter of Andriola v. Ortiz, 82 N.Y.2d 320, 324-326, cert denied sub nom. Andriola v. Antinoro, 511 U.S. 1031; see also, Carro v. City of New York, 214 A.D.2d 450; Christensen v. Levitt, 207 A.D.2d 320; Matter of Archer v Riccio, 201 A.D.2d 395).

Petitioner's attempt to distinguish his circumstances from those in Andriola is unavailing inasmuch as that case and its progeny draw no distinction between affirmative or intentional conduct by respondents, on the one hand, and passive or negligent conduct by respondents, on the other, and, in any event, retroactive relief granted on the basis of either would equally violate the "one-in-three rule" of Civil Service Law § 61 ( cf., Matter of Beame v. DeLeon, 87 N.Y.2d 289; see generally, Davis, New York Court of Appeals Roundup, Remedies for Discrimination; The Role of Dissent, NYLJ, Jan. 16, 1996, at 3, col 1).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF GRECO v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL
(Apr 2, 1996)