Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was deprived of his right to counsel during a lineup identification procedure. However, he failed to raise or develop this claim until the present appeal, and the record is therefore factually insufficient to permit appellate review of the issue ( see, People v. Kinchen, 60 N.Y.2d 772; People v. Cornelius, 217 A.D.2d 587; People v. Lopez, 160 A.D.2d 335; People v. Donovon, 107 A.D.2d 433).
The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that he was prejudiced by certain remarks made by the prosecutor during cross-examination and summation inasmuch as the trial court sustained his objections thereto and the defendant requested no further relief ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951; People v. Dawson, 50 N.Y.2d 311; People v. Lewis, 175 A.D.2d 885). In any event, while some of those comments would have been better left unsaid, they were harmless under the circumstances of this case ( see, People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; People v. Smith, 199 A.D.2d 439). Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.