PAUL v. DIXON

1. Pleadings 19c — Where all the defendants join in a demurrer to the complaint upon the ground that it does not set forth a good cause of action, the demurrer will be overruled if the complaint sets forth a good cause of action as to any one of the defendants.

2. Quieting Title 1 — Complaint held sufficient to allege cause of action to quiet title. Allegations to the effect that prior to the deed executed to plaintiff by husband and wife, the husband and wife had conveyed by registered deed other lands to the wife and others, but that the description included a portion of the lands conveyed to plaintiff, and praying that if the deed to the defendants conveyed a part of the land thereafter conveyed to plaintiff, by design, the interest of the femme grantor-grantee be reduced under the equity of marshalling, in order to exonerate that part conveyed by her to plaintiff, or that if the description was erroneous in including a part of the lands conveyed to plaintiff, the cloud on plaintiff's title should be removed, held sufficient to state a cause of action against the femme grantor-grantee, at least.

Civil action to declare plaintiff owner of certain land described in complaint, freed and discharged of claim of defendants Rhoda Scott Dixon and Dallas Crawford Dixon and Shirley Elva Dixon, — heard upon demurrer entered jointly by defendants.

Plaintiff, Adele H. Paul, widow of Zack H. Paul, who died 16 July 1954, alleges in her complaint substantially the following: (Paragraph numbers of complaint disregarded)

1. That, as alleged in paragraph 3 of complaint, on April 17, 1944, S.E. Dixon and wife, Rhoda S. Dixon, executed and delivered to Zack H. Paul and wife, Adele H. Paul, a deed conveying certain land therein described, with full covenants of seizin, right to convey, free from encumbrances, warranting to defend the title to the same against all other persons whomsoever, said deed being recorded in the office of Register of Deeds of Pamlico in Deed Book 109, p. 578.

2. That plaintiff, jointly with her husband, Zack H. Paul, so long as he lived, and individually since his death, has been in possession of the aforesaid lands, occupying and improving same until the present time; and that no other person than plaintiff or her husband has paid taxes thereon since the conveyance to them.

3. "That recently and within less than a year of this date, the plaintiff's attention was called to a deed, dated August 15, 1939, which is of record in the office of the Register of Deeds of Pamlico County in Book 95, page 404, from S.E. Dixon and wife, Rhoda Scott Dixon, to Rhoda Scott Dixon, Dallas Crawford Dixon and Shirley Elva Dixon * * * conveying * * * three tracts of land," therein described, the third tract of which purports to convey certain portion of the lands described in the deed from S.E. Dixon and wife, Rhoda S. Dixon, to Zack H. Paul and wife, Adele H. Paul, "while the remainder of said description covers other lands adjacent to or near the land conveyed by S.E. Dixon and wife, Rhoda S. Dixon, to Zack H. Paul and wife, Adele H. Paul." And plaintiff, upon information and belief, alleges, "that either by inadvertence or mistake of the draftsman, or by design unknown to the plaintiff or her husband, the lands described in the deed to her husband and to herself were also contained in the description in the deed from defendant S.E. Dixon and wife, Rhoda Scott Dixon, to their co-defendants and to Rhoda Scott Dixon."

4. And upon information and belief plaintiff also alleges, "that the above situation and transaction is such that the plaintiff is entitled to have the lands conveyed to her and her husband exonerated from any claim by the defendants or any one of them, and that in equity and under the doctrine of marshalling, any rights which the defendants, Dallas Crawford Dixon and Shirley Elva Dixon might have or claim to have in the lands conveyed to the plaintiff and her husband, Zack H. Paul, should be transferred to the lands not covered by that deed but conveyed to Rhoda Scott Dixon, Dallas Crawford Dixon and Shirley Elva Dixon, jointly, and that the rights, if any, of Rhoda Scott Dixon should be diminished because of her warranty as to the lands conveyed to the plaintiff and her husband.

5. And that if the court should find that the aforesaid descriptions were made by inadvertence or by error, the same constitutes a cloud upon plaintiff's title, and she is entitled to have same removed.

Wherefore, plaintiff prays judgment.

Defendants demur to the complaint for that "The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendants in that it appears from the face of the complaint that at the time of the execution and delivery of the deed to the plaintiff and her husband on April 17, 1944, that there was a deed of record in Pamlico County in Book 95, at page 404, Pamlico Registry, dated August 15, 1939, which conveyed undivided interest in said lands to the defendants Rhoda Scott Dixon, Shirley Elva Dixon and Dallas Crawford Dixon, and that Rhoda Scott Dixon could only have had a one-third undivided interest to convey to the plaintiff and her husband, and the same was notice of said fact to all the world"; and, further, that "It appears upon the face of the complaint that in law Mrs. Adele H. Paul is the legal and equitable owner of a one-third undivided interest in the land referred to in paragraph 3 of the complaint only, and is a tenant in common with Dallas Crawford Dixon and Shirley Elva Dixon."

Defendants, therefore, pray that the action be dismissed.

The cost being of opinion that said demurrer should be sustained as to Shirley Elva Dixon and Dallas Crawford Dixon, entered judgment in accordance, therewith, granting to plaintiff leave to amend her complaint and plead as she may be advised.

Plaintiff excepted thereto, and appeals to Supreme Court and assigns error.