AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PHYLLIS REALTY COMPANY, Respondent, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Title.)

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

It is well settled that a claimant's failure to file sworn proof of loss within 60 days after the demand therefor constitutes an absolute defense to an action to recover damages under an insurance policy, absent a waiver of the requirement by the insurance carrier or conduct on its part estopping assertion of the defense ( see, Igbara Realty Corp. v. New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 63 N.Y.2d 201; Goldman v. Allstate Ins. Cos., 220 A.D.2d 381).

There is no dispute that the plaintiff failed to file the proof of loss within the allotted time. Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, nothing in the record demonstrates that the defendant waived, or should be estopped from raising, the defense (see, Igbara Realty Corp. v. New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., supra; Goldman v. Allstate Ins. Cos., supra). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PHYLLIS REALTY COMPANY v. TRAVELERS INS. CO
(May 13, 1996)