Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CONCETTA MAROTTA, PLAINTIFF, v. NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCEUNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, BY AND THROUGH ITS SERVICING CARRIER LIBERTYMUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANTS.NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, BY ANDTHROUGH ITS SERVICING CARRIER, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 280 N.J. Super. 525, 656 A.2d 20 (1995).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MAROTTA v. AUTO. INS. UNDERWRIT
(Jun 11, 1996)