AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

CITY OF ROANOKE v. RONALD F. RENICK

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.

JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON.

The Workers' Compensation Commission awarded benefits to the claimant, Ronald F. Renick, for his condition of esophageal motility disorder resulting from extreme stress in his employment. Renick's employer appeals, challenging both the classification of his condition as an occupational disease and the causal link to his employment.

The parties are fully conversant with the record to this case, and a recitation of the facts is unnecessary to this memorandum opinion.

Renick's condition was established as a disease. All medical records as well as the medical literature demonstrate that the treating doctors as well as the medical community believe this to be a disease. This classification is a medical issue to be decided by the trier of fact based on evidence at the hearing.Knott v. Blue Bell, Inc., 7 Va. App. 335, 338, 373 S.E.2d 481, 483 (1988).

Renick's employment caused the stress that triggered his condition. No other source of stress was noted or argued by either doctors or counsel. The treating specialists ruled out other causes and came to the conclusion that stress caused his condition. "[A] determination of causation is a factual finding."Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Musick, 7 Va. App. 684, 688, 376 S.E.2d 814, 817 (1989).

We find that credible evidence supports the commission's findings, and we will not disturb them on appeal. The decision of the commission is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF ROANOKE v. RENICK, 2643-95-3, Unpublished (Va.App. 7-2-1996)
(Jul 2, 1996)