AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of JAMES M. CATTERSON, JR., as District Attorney of Suffolk County, Petitioner, v. JOHN J.J. JONES, JR., as Judge of Suffolk County Court, et al., Respondents.

Motions by the respondents to dismiss the proceeding.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motions, it is

Ordered that the motions are denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, and the respondent John J.J. Jones, Jr., is prohibited from enforcing the order dated May 8, 1996.

The respondent Judge John J.J. Jones, Jr., acted in excess of his authorized powers in requiring the People to disclose the subject witness statements since such disclosure is authorized neither by statute or case law ( see, CPL 240.20; see also, People v. Dukes, 156 A.D.2d 203). Thus the writ of prohibition is hereby granted ( see, Matter of Hynes v. Cirigliano, 180 A.D.2d 659). Bracken, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CATTERSON v. JONES
(Jul 8, 1996)