Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM E. BURNS, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT. ERIC SPREITZER, PETITIONER,

PER CURIAM.

We granted review of State v. Burns, 661 So.2d 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), and State v. Spreitzer, 659 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), and consolidated those cases based on apparent conflict with Allred v. State, 622 So.2d 984 (Fla. 1993), and Traylor v. State, 596 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1992). See Art. V, § 3 (b)(4), Fla. Const.; see also Seaboard Air Line R.R. v. Branham, 104 So.2d 356 (Fla. 1958)(holding this Court must look to opinion upon which district court's decision is based to determine probable existence of direct conflict with a decision of the Supreme Court on same point of law). Upon examination of the record and consideration of argument by counsel, we have determined that jurisdiction was granted improvidently. Accordingly, because we find no alternative basis for jurisdiction, this cause is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BURNS v. STATE
(Jul 18, 1996)