AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of LILA GOLD, Appellant, v. HOWARD L. LASHER et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Howard L. Lasher as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 10, 1996, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Judge of the Surrogate's Court, Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated July 31, 1996, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the instant proceeding for lack of jurisdiction due to the petitioner's failure to comply with the provisions of the order to show cause (see, Election Law § 16-116; Matter of Caruso v Nassau County Bd. of Elections, 186 A.D.2d 701; Matter of Washington v Mahoney, 71 A.D.2d 1047; cf., Matter of Previdi v Matthews, 185 A.D.2d 962, 963). Hart, J.P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF GOLD v. LASHER
(Aug 20, 1996)