Petitioner, a prison inmate, sent correspondence to a civilian revealing his involvement in a Latino gang. After this letter was returned to the prison for an insufficient address, a corrcetion officer opened it pursuant to 7 NYCRR 720.4 (i) and, after noting that the author signed his name "Warrior", read the letter ( see, 7 NYCRR 720.4 [d]). Subsequently, petitioner's cell was searched and correspondence from the civilian to petitioner was confiscated. Petitioner was charged withengaging in unauthorized organizational activities. Following a disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of this charge. Petitioner argues, inter alia, that the administrative determination is not supported by substantial evidence. We find this argument to be unpersuasive.
Claimant testified throughout the hearing that the correspondence referred to his involvement in the Latin American Organization, an organization approved by the Department of Correctional Services. The letters, however, which were admitted into evidence at the hearing, contained language suggesting petitioner's involvement in gangrelated activities which threatened the order of the facility. We find that the letters, the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it provide substantial evidence supporting the administrative determination. We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find that they are without merit.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.