KEENAN v. MAASS

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

CC 94-C-11097; CA A84950; SC S43465

Attorney(S)

Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on
With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General,
Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor
No appearance

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

CC 94-C-11097; CA A84950; SC S43465

Attorney(S)

Philip Schradle, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on
With him on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General,
Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor
No appearance

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CHARLES M. KEENAN, Respondent on Re v. ew,

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in the light of Billings v. Gates, 323 Or. 167, 916 P.2d 291 (1996).

Fadeley, J., would not allow petition for review.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CHARLES M. KEENAN, Respondent on Re v. ew,

Comments