Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Charlotte KILLINER v. Curtis WILSON.

COOK, Justice.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.

HOUSTON and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent.

HOUSTON, Justice (dissenting).

I dissent. See Ala. Code 1975, § 6-5-391 (amended August 8, 1995); Lowe v. Fulford, 442 So.2d 29 (Ala. 1983); Meighan v. Birmingham Terminal Co., 165 Ala. 591, 51 So. 775 (1910). Even though I have in the past vigorously disagreed with this rule of law (see Tatum v. Schering Corp., 523 So.2d 1042, 1047-63 (Ala. 1988) (Houston, J., dissenting)), damages in Alabama wrongful death cases are entirely punitive. That being the case, Mr. Wilson had no vested right to receive these punitive damages for the death of his minor son David, Lowe v. Fulford, even though, as the parent with David's custody, Mr. Wilson had the exclusive right to initiate the action to seek to recover for David's wrongful death. § 6-5-391. After Mr. Wilson filed his action to recover for David's death, but before that action was settled, the legislature amended § 6-5-391 to provide that proceeds received from an action based on the wrongful death of a minor are to be distributed in accordance with the laws of intestate succession. Therefore, David's mother, Ms. Killiner, should have received part of these proceeds.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KILLINER v. WILSON
(Oct 25, 1996)