Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

In re Christopher G. HAWKINS, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before the court on the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility to disbar respondent following his conviction for a crime involving moral turpitude. Respondent was convicted in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, of possession for sale of a controlled substance (cocaine), in violation of California Health and Safety Code § 11351. We have held that the crime of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute involves moral turpitude per se. See In re Mendes, 598 A.2d 168, 169 (D.C. 1991); In re Campbell, 572 A.2d 1059, 1061 (D.C. 1990). The crimes of conviction in those decisions are indistinguishable from the crime for which respondent was convicted. Accordingly, respondent must be disbarred. D.C. Code § 11-2503(a) (1995); In re Colson, 412 A.2d 1160 (D.C. 1979) (en banc).

We therefore order respondent disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia effective immediately. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(f) (1996).

So ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE HAWKINS
(Nov 21, 1996)