Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court properly denied suppression of physical and identification evidence obtained as a result of the warrantless entry by the police into the apartment to which the defendant fled. Here, the defendant failed to establish a reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to the premises searched and, thus, lacked standing to challenge the warrantless entry and subsequent search and seizure ( see, People v Wesley, 73 NY2d 351; People v Rodriguez, 69 NY2d 159; People v Mills, 159 AD2d 520; cf., People v Garrett, 177 AD2d 705). In any event, the police entry into the subject apartment was proper under both the consent ( see, People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122) and exigent circumstances exceptions to warrantless searches and seizures ( see, People v Adrion, 82 NY2d 628; People v Elwell, 50 NY2d 231; People v Calhoun, 49 NY2d 398; People v Green, 103 AD2d 362).
The defendant waived his speedy trial claim due to his failure to provide the People with reasonable notice of his CPL 30.30 motion to dismiss the indictment ( see, People v Lawrence, 64 NY2d 200; People v Bernhardt, 223 AD2d 595; People v Harvall, 196 AD2d 553; People v Littles, 188 AD2d 255).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.