AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

JOY HASTEN, EMPLOYEE/APPELLANT, v. WAL-MART, EMPLOYER/RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM

ORDER

This is an appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. Claimant alleges the administrative law judge used the wrong legal standard when determining causation and that the decision of the Commission is not supported by substantial and competent evidence. We have carefully reviewed all of the evidence in the record and find competent and substantial evidence exists to support the Commission's decision and such evidence is not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. We discern no jurisprudential value in issuing an extended legal opinion. The judgment of the Commission is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HASTEN v. WAL-MART
(Dec 3, 1996)