In making the temporary maintenance award, the motion court properly considered and balanced the respective income and financial situation of the parties, their age, health, necessities and obligations, the nature and duration of the marriage, the present and future capacity of plaintiff to be self-supporting, the standard of living during the marriage, the tax consequences to the parties, and the income which the parties are capable of earning by honest efforts (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]; Baker v Baker, 120 AD2d 374, 375). The award of interim counsel fees is necessary to enable plaintiff to proceed with the case and reflects the circumstances of the respective parties (Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v CabreraRosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881). The appropriate remedy for any perceived inequity in a pendente lite award is a prompt trial where the facts may be examined in far greater detail and where a more accurate appraisal of the financial situation of the parties may be obtained ( Moshy v Moshy, 227 AD2d 182).