AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of DAVID M. TENACE, a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent. DAVID M. TENACE, Appellant; THOMAS HAYNER, as Schenectady County Attorney, Respondent.

Fourteen years after an order was entered adjudicating petitioner a juvenile delinquent, he moved to vacate it. Family Court denied the motion on the ground that the time to appeal had expired.

We affirm, but on a different ground. While the right to seek legal redress is broad, it is not without limitations. One limitation is that a party cannot unreasonably and inexcusably delay in seeking relief to the prejudice of the opposing party ( see, Matter of Schulz v State of New York, 81 NY2d 336, 348). In this instance, as petitioner has offered no explanation for his delay which was inherently prejudicial to respondent, the denial of his motion was justified ( see, 75 NY Jur 2d, Limitations and Laches, § 336, at 541).

Ordered that the amended order is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE TENACE
(Dec 12, 1996)