Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly denied the plaintiffs motion to vacate that portion of a 1980 stipulation entered into between the parties related to the partition and sale of the former marital residence. The plaintiff has failed to establish that the agreement was the result of fraud or overreaching, or that its terms can be considered unconscionable ( see, Warren v Rabinowitz, 228 AD2d 492; Nasifoglu v Nasifoglu, 224 AD2d 504; Tirrito v Tirrito, 191 AD2d 686).
The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit.