Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

PEOPLE v FISH (ON SECOND REMAND)

ON SECOND REMAND

PER CURIAM.

This case has been remanded to this Court a second time, with instructions to reconsider our prior opinion in light of People v Weatherholt, 214 Mich. App. 507; 543 N.W.2d 34 (1995). 451 Mich. 891 (1996). The facts and issues are set out in our previous decision, People v Fish (On Remand), 207 Mich. App. 486; 525 N.W.2d 467 (1994).

The issues in this case have been resolved by this Court's opinion in Weatherholt, supra, where a special conflict panel held that conviction of the felony, operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of liquor, third offense, is a mere sentence enhancement of the underlying OUIL misdemeanor conviction. MCL 257.625(6)(d); MSA 9.2325(6)(d). See now subsection 7 of § 625. This panel is bound by that decision.

The circuit court order reinstating the OUIL-3 charge is affirmed. This matter is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion and Weatherholt, supra. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. FISH (ON SECOND REMAND)
(Dec 20, 1996)