AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID LUSH, Appellant.

Memorandum:

County Court erred in denying defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment without first conducting a hearing to determine whether defendant was denied due process of law by preindictment delay ( see, People v Lesiuk, 81 NY2d 485, 490; People v Fuller, 57 NY2d 152, 159; People v Vasquez, 79 AD2d 621; People v Marshall, 72 AD2d 799, 800). Under the circumstances of this case, a hearing must be conducted to determine whether the 14-month delay in arresting and indicting defendant was unreasonable or was "`a determination made in good faith to defer commencement of the prosecution for further investigation or for other sufficient reasons'" ( People v Lesiuk, supra, at 490, quoting People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241, 254). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J." Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DAVID LUSH
(Dec 30, 1996)