Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant wife, as the party challenging the validity of the prenuptial agreement, failed to sustain her burden of proof that the agreement was the product of fraud, overreaching, or other misconduct by the plaintiff husband ( see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [3]; Forsberg v Forsberg, 219 AD2d 615; Panossian v Panossian, 172 AD2d 811; Christian v Christian, 42 NY2d 63; Pierce v Pierce, 71 NY 154; 2 Foster, Freed and Brandes, Law and the Family New York § 8.8 [2d ed]). Accordingly, the agreement was properly held enforceable.