AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAFAEL TAVARES, Appellant.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The complainant's testimony established that defendant attacked the complainant and threatened to kill him unless money was turned over, and repeatedly attempted to open the store's cash register, all of which clearly demonstrates an intent to forcibly steal property. Although defendant made statements during the crime demanding payment for a purported debt, such a claim, even if made in good faith, would not constitute a defense to attempted robbery in these circumstances ( People v Reid, 69 NY2d 469). Moreover, there was ample evidence to support the jury's finding that the complainant suffered "physical injury" (Penal Law § 160.10 [a]).

On the totality of the record, we find that defendant received effective assistance of trial counsel ( People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. TAVARES
(Jan 23, 1997)