Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LARRY R. DOWE, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner,

¶ 1. ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.

This case is before the court on a petition for review filed by the defendant, Larry R. Dowe. The defendant seeks review of a court of appeals' decision affirming a non-final order of the circuit court for Waukesha County, Marianne E. Becker, Judge, denying his motion to dismiss. The defendant argues that because possession of marijuana with intent to deliver is a lesser-included offense of being a dealer in possession of marijuana without a tax stamp, the State's act of charging him with both offenses constitutes double jeopardy.

State v. Dowe, 197 Wis.2d 848, 541 N.W.2d 218 (1995).

Wis. Stat. § 161.41(1m)(h)1 (1991-92).

Wis. Stat. § 139.95(2) (1991-92).

¶ 2. In State v. Hall, No. 94-2848-CR (S. Ct. Jan. 24, 1997), this court held that the drug tax stamp statute is unconstitutional. Thus, we do not reach the double jeopardy issue presented in this case, because the defendant cannot be prosecuted for being a dealer in possession of marijuana without a tax stamp. Instead, we reverse and remand to the circuit court for further proceedings on the charge of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and with directions to dismiss with prejudice the drug tax stamp charge. By the Court. — Reversed and cause remanded with directions.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. DOWE
(Jan 24, 1997)